Brown Takes Peace in Palestine Seriously

By Jackson Wyrick

In a bold step towards peace, United Kingdom Prime Minister Gordon Brown visited the West Bank city of Bethlehem and met with Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas. Brown made some brave statements that aren't likely to increase his popularity in Israel.

Brown pledged the UK's support towards pursuing a peace with Israel based on the 1967 borders with Jerusalem being the capitol of both nations. For Israel, this would mean returning much of the land it seized in the 1967 war. It also leaves major problems to be solved, like sovereignty of holy sites in the Old City of Jerusalem and the Mount of Olives. Also, this would leave much of the West Bank divided by the Israeli "Security Barrier", which goes far into 1967 Palestine.

The "Security Barrier" is a controversial issue in itself. In 2004, the International Court of Justice ruled it to be illegal since it de facto annexed large portions of the West Bank into Israel and divided many Palestinian communities. Israel says they need the barrier because it has been effective in preventing suicide bombs, which it has. In general, Israelis prefer to call the barrier a fence, which it is for much of its length. Along major cities, though, the barrier is a 25 foot concrete wall, which is how most Palestinians refer to it. "But today the wall here is graphic evidence of the urgent need for justice for the Palestinian people and an end to the occupation," said Brown.

What is so bold about Brown's talk was that he approached it with one thing in mind: peace for Israel and Palestine. He did not worry about using the politically correct language or avoiding verbal taboos, which are all to common in the Middle East. He simply looked for how to make progress towards peace, and to do that, he was willing to call a wall a wall, or say that peace can't come until average Palestinians see improving economic conditions. He emphasized the importance of providing Palestinians with "jobs, housing, and basic services," something many Palestinians are without.

Another bold statement Brown made was his call on Israel to freeze settlements. In the poverty stricken West Bank, Israeli settlements, equipped with pools, dominate the mountaintops, and the Israeli government has not been freezing settlements. It's hard to imagine peace in the area, though, and few politicians have brave enough to discuss the issue of settlements.

During my time in Israel, I was dismayed by a predominant Israeli ideology that either peace is not possible or that Israel has done all it can towards peace and should do no more. Either way, the peace process is stuck in Israel. Yossi Klein Halevi, senior fellow at the Shalem Center, acknowledged that many Palestinians are being denied human rights, but their leadership left Israel no choice, so, "Too Bad".

Brown doesn't buy the "Too Bad" ideology. He is making bold steps towards reaching peace and ensuring the rights of not just Israelis, but Palestinians as well. It is promising to see a world leader committed to the peace process. Hopefully more will follow.